thegrocer.co.uk
  subscribe for full access    |   contact us    |   about us    |   advertise    |   sitemap  
Welcome visitor      Register  |  Login
thegrocer.co.uk   Search    

Second Opinion: The crops stolen from Palestine

In: Columnists

| More

Produce grown by Israel on illegally occupied territory should be shunned, says Joanna Blythman


Herbs, citrus, Medjoul dates, cherry tomatoes ... lawyers from Defra, the FSA and the Foreign and Commonwealth Office are currently drafting regulations on the labelling of foods such as these from 'Israel'.

Most of it comes from the fertile Jordan Valley of the West Bank, a great place to grow food - but the problem for legal minds, and indeed anyone with a sense of justice, is that they are grown in Israeli settlements on Palestinian territory. The way the Palestinians, and many international commentators, see it, the Israeli-occupied West Bank is stolen land, so the fruit and veg grown there amount to stolen goods.

Under international law, these settlements are illegal because the West Bank does not belong to Israel. (The Geneva Convention states the transfer of a civilian population into an occupied territory is unlawful.) The West Bank lies on the Palestinian side of the 'green line' marking the internationally recognised border but has been under illegal occupation since Israel took it by force in 1967, confiscating land and water rights from Palestinians.

Wide-ranging global campaigns to boycott Israel continue to grow apace and since Israel's Operation Cast Lead bombardment of the Gaza Strip in January, UK public opinion has hardened. It sticks in the throat to buy settlement produce, whether labelled from 'Israel' or 'West Bank'. The latter wording encourages concerned consumers to believe they are helping Palestinian farmers when the opposite is the case. Both labels allow Israel to take advantage of the EU-Israel preferential trade agreement, so depriving the British taxpayer of trade tariff revenue. The only clear and honest wording appropriate is 'from illegal Israeli settlements in the West Bank'.

While legal eagles deliberate, retailers and importers should be actively looking for alternatives to so-called Israeli produce. Retailers tell us that they are apolitical and believe in giving consumers a choice. But for months at a time, their shelves are stocked wall-to-wall with Israeli produce while alternative sources, such as Egypt, Spain and Italy, are largely ignored. What kind of choice is this ?

Unfortunately, our retailers have become lazily dependent on their 'category captains' who deal in Jordan Valley produce. They may yet get a bitter taste of the consumer boycott that proved so effective against apartheid in South Africa.


Joanna Blythman is a food journalist and author of Bad Food Britain.

Comments: 18


Login or Register to post a comment...

[Anonymous] 11/12/2009 10:54:26

There is no such thing in international law or treaty as palestinian land. All the land west of the Jordan river is the Jewish Homeland. The Arabs/Moslems tell lies as a religeous duty. Do not appease or capitualte to them.


[Anonymous] 02/09/2009 09:23:55

If the pharmacutical companies are running their companies in the West Bank thanks to government subsidies then we should boycott them. There are plenty of other countries we could source pharmacuticals from. Im really glad that Israel sees fit to cure the Pacific Islands of Diabetes, prehaps you could explain how this effects the Israel/Palestine conflict? If you are so against boycotts then prehaps you can explain the complete blockade of Gaza? Oh right, its to stop weapons getting in. Lets look at some of those weapons parts Israel is stopping. Avacado Pears (obviously used in the warhead), bandages (maybe a propellant), window panes (bunkers protection). Yup, that makes sense. Children had to have phosphorous burns treated with cotton wool becuase there were no real bandages in Gaza. Cotton wool sticks to wounds and has to be changed daily. Thanks Israel, shinning light of the world, treating diabetes in the Pacific Islands!


[Anonymous] 26/08/2009 17:27:56

I just came across this article. Let's compare Blythman's miserable screed with Israel's efforts providing healthy nutrition programs in the 3rd world. I am am sure she just sees it as a Zionist plot to sell more oranges.
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3763498,00.html
 


[Anonymous] 26/08/2009 01:58:26

Why stop at produce? Stand by your convictions and boycott Israeli pharmacuticals, medical technology, surgical protocals and laboratory analyticals. Why, you could even carry a card in your wallet demanding that treatment be withheld in case of emergency. Her boycott  idea is as pointless as suggesting to avoid getting the Swine flu immunization...oh wait, she's already done that.


[Anonymous] 21/08/2009 14:13:34

242:

‘Emphasizing the inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by war and the need to work for a just and lasting peace in which every State in the area can live in security,...’

446:

1. Determines that the policy and practices of Israel in establishing settlements in the Palestinian and other Arab territories occupied since 1967 have no legal validity and constitute a serious obstruction to achieving a comprehensive, just and lasting peace in the Middle East;

You are arguing semantics now.


[Anonymous] 20/08/2009 19:55:09

Neither 242 nor 446 refers to 'illegality'

Like Blythman, you lose all credibility when you fail to be truthful


[Anonymous] 20/08/2009 16:45:43

Surely International law is international law and cannot be dismissed through wishing it didn’t exist. UN Security Council Resolution’s 242 (1967) and 446 (1979) clearly refer to the illegality of the Israeli settlements in the West Bank. The latter resolution includes: ‘The policy and practice of Israel in establishing settlements in the Palestinian and other Arab territories occupied since 1967 have no legal validity and constitute a serious obstruction to achieving a comprehensive, just and lasting peace in the Middle East.’

The British Prime Minister has always regarded the settlements as ‘illegal settlements’ as do many other states worldwide. This is not being anti-Israel in any shape or form, just stating what is an established legal fact.  If goods are being sold to Europe as being produced in Israel or the West Bank, yet is actually being grown on land that that by international law is deemed illegal, then the public and those in the food industry have a right to know.  So thank you to The Grocer for highlighting this to us. 


[Anonymous] 20/08/2009 10:10:14

Thank you Joanna for writing such an honest and researched piece. I agree that everyone should do their own research on this matter and try to understand the complexity of the situation. However, there are all things we can do to make sure we aren't supporting an economy that makes money off land that is appropriated with force. I have now stopped buying food marked West Bank also as I cannot be sure it is not 'Israeli' produce. I will simply go without if I can't be sure of the source, I feel this 'sacrifice' pales in comparison with the problems Palestinians are facing. 
Good work Joanna and I hope to see alot more from you on this one!


[Anonymous] 19/08/2009 12:45:05

Bravo Joanna for writing such an important commentary. We need more courageous people such as yourself to speak out about the situation in Palestine. Particularly important are the more insidious issues like exporting Israeli products made in illegal settlements on confiscated Palestinian land and often labelled as if they are coming from Palestinians. Since moving to London I have become much more aware of the products that I buy and have noticed that in most of the grocery stores, I often have no choice between a product from Israel and one that comes from another country. I find this extremely disappointing and have in fact raised this issue with both Waitrose and Tesco. We of course need more people to make similar complaints, but ultimately it is the buyers for these stores who should stop buying Israeli products or to at least provide consumers with alternatives.

I fully agree with the previous comment that readers ought to do their own research. As is usual with any topic that involves Israel, those who come to its defence do so by listing facts that are totally unfounded. And this is perhaps understandable because it is difficult to justify Israel’s continuing military occupation of Palestinian land and the theft of that land by Israeli settlers.

Many thanks to the editors at The Grocer for publishing this comment.
 


[Anonymous] 19/08/2009 10:20:57

And finally the purely Ad hominem attack, we have reached the gamut of Israeli defense for the land theft. Firstly we were told that the Arabs destroyed the infrastructure required for farming. Then we are told that before Israelis moved in Arabs were not producing anything on the land, they somehow magically survived on the air itself. That is followed with what can only be described as the dumbest interpretation of the Fourth Geneva Convention to date. Then we are reminded that other regimes are more evil, so evil in fact that any criticism of Israel is just 'hatred'. I sincerely plead any readers not to trust mine, or any of the previous posters 'facts'. Do your own research, find out what is happening in the occupied terrotories today. Read about Giyus.org, the Hasbarra and then ask yourself abouth the validity of the previous arguments.


Page: 1 of 2   


Features
> News and analysis
> Product news
> Reports
> Convenience Store news
> Events
> Latest FMCG TV ads
> Archive
News direct to you
> Newsfeeds (RSS)
> Email alerts
> The Grocer: digital edition
> Convenience Store: digital edition
> Subscribe
> Accessibility
About this website
> About us
> Terms and Conditions
> Privacy Policy
> Sitemap
> Register
> Advertise
GrocerJobs
> Job search
> A-Z of recruiters
> Jobs by email
> Create a profile
> Careers advice
> Advertise jobs
Related websites
> William Reed subscriptions
> Food manufacture news
> Hospitality news and jobs
> Pub news and property
> Food industry directory
> News for wholesalers
> Forecourt retailer news
William Reed Business Media Ltd. © William Reed Business Media Ltd 2010. All rights reserved.
Registered Office: Broadfield Park, Crawley RH11 9RT. Registered in England No. 2883992. 
VAT No. 644 3073 52.