Editor's Comment: Why can’t an offer be extended if it has done well?

  • Print
  • Share
  • Comment
  • Save

Fingers is at it again.

Meddlesome OFT chief John Fingleton, an economist, has been sticking his digits into "the advertising of prices", and after 10 months of prodding, his proposals to address misleading claims will be unveiled next week.

But The Grocer has seen a draft of the proposals (p5), and, if they come into force in December, they are likely to have a very significant impact indeed on the promotions landscape.

The OFT is at pains to point out these are not new rules. It has simply worked to interpret the significance of s0-called CPRs (Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations) as they apply to seven pricing practices: reference pricing; time-limited offers; drip pricing; baiting; volume discounts; 'free' offers; and other complex or confusing pricing.

As with so many OFT initiatives, the proposals are born of good intentions, too. As it says, price offers based on any of the seven practices reviewed are acceptable in principle as long as they are used in "a clear, honest manner that does not mislead".

Based on the new proposals, however, it is apparent that the OFT considers a number of existing interpretations to be unclear, misleading and, by implication, downright dishonest.

In some instances, I think the OFT has a valid case. The practice of baiting (advertising a deep discount on Dom Pérignon when only a handful of bottles are available, for example), and masking price rises with promotions shows a lack of respect for the customer. Wild swings in price also create confusion as to the real price.

But in other areas I expect retailers next week to start challenging the OFT's interpretations. What's wrong with a permanent rollback? Why can't an offer be extended if it has done well, and the consumer likes it?

The devil is always in the detail, but with all the promotions out there are we honestly not getting a good deal?

Have your say

These comments have not been moderated.

You are encouraged to participate with comments that are relevant to our news stories. You should not post comments that are abusive, threatening, defamatory, misleading or invasive of privacy. For the full terms and conditions for commenting see clause 7 of our Terms and Conditions ‘Participating in Online Communities’. These terms may be updated from time to time, so please read them before posting a comment.

Any comment that violates these terms may be removed in its entirety as we do not edit comments.

If you wish to complain about a comment please use the “report this comment” facility or email groceremails@wrbm.com

Mandatory
Mandatory
Mandatory
Mandatory

Related images

  • ADAM LEYLAND
  • Print
  • Share
  • Comment
  • Save

DIRECTORY

The+Grocer+Directory

CLICK HERE to search for the products, services and companies you need in the definitive guide to the UK food and drink industry.

FOLLOW THE GROCER

The Grocer's commentators and opinion makers