Report comment

What a shame this journalist feels that a reduction in heart disease due to the government's robust advice isn't worth celebrating. More so, what a shame she doesn't appear to understand the basics of nutrition otherwise she probably wouldn't make such ridiculous statements. But then again what would one expect from someone an unqualified in nutrition. The opinion expressed here has been proven time and time again to be worthless, yet some still feel they can make such statements without understanding the potential damage they could cause.

If we revert to high fat, low carbohydrate standard advice, just exactly what do you think will happen? Now think carefully about this, as the totality of evidence would weigh against any argument you could put up. And where would we be in 10 years time? I would put my money on higher obesity rates, higher heart disease, higher cancer, and higher diabetes. Would you care to take the bet and prove that you wouldn't be at greater risk of these health ailments if you followed such unproven advice?