This article is part of our Soft Drinks Report 2015

As health campaigners increasingly target soft drinks, their efforts are starting to gain traction with consumers.

That is the warning for the soft drinks sector from an exclusive poll for The Grocer, which reveals more than three quarters of Brits now believe full-sugar carbonates are “unhealthy”, and 45% are in favour of a tax on sugary soft drinks.

Consumers’ biggest concerns centre on high-sugar, high-caffeine energy drinks, our poll reveals. More than half of British shoppers – and 65% of parents – believe their sale to under-16s should be banned, while three quarters describe energy drinks as “unhealthy” and 47% support the idea of a special tax on them.

By comparison, 39% want a tax on full-sugar carbonates, and 38% favour a tax on sugary sports drinks.

“Energy drinks are clearly seen as the stand-out target for taxation,” says Lucia Juliano, head of consumer retail research at Harris Interactive, which polled 2,000 consumers for The Grocer.

“Half of the public and almost two-thirds of parents believe the sale of energy drinks to children should be banned. This is a very strong message to a category that’s booming. It suggests many people are not sure what is in these drinks and the effects of the ingredients on children.”

Despite these consumer concerns, the market is in strong growth. Combined sales of the 10 biggest energy drink SKUs have surged 8.2% to £753.3m on volumes up 10.6% in the past year [IRI 52 w/e 31 January 2015].

Campaign group Action on Sugar, which called for the sale of energy drinks to be banned to under-16s in February, says the poll’s findings are further evidence of the public’s growing concern over the toll food and drink with high sugar levels is having on the nation’s health.

“Energy drinks in particular should have no part in children’s diets, and it’s very interesting that even non-parents believe sales of energy drinks should be banned to under-16s,” says campaign director Katharine Jenner.

“We hope the government, who have failed to pay heed to the evidence that a sugary drinks duty will work to reduce sugar intakes, will at least pay attention to the public’s opinion. Everyone agrees: it’s time to reduce sugar, now.”

Not quite everyone. ”We don’t believe there is strong support for taxes on popular products which do not achieve the solutions their proponents claim,” says Gavin Partington, director general of the British Soft Drinks Association. 

“There’s no evidence a tax on soft drinks has an impact on levels of obesity. In fact, both Belgium and Denmark rejected the notion of a tax in 2013 and evidence from France shows that while sales of soft drinks initially fell after a tax was introduced in 2012, they have increased since.

“The soft drinks industry has done more than any other sector to promote calorie reduction, through reformulation, smaller pack sizes and increased promotion of low and no calorie drinks. The wider food and drink industry should be concerned to see a particular product singled out this way.”

Our research does indeed suggest many consumers would not be put off buying sugary drinks if they were subject to an obesity tax.

One in five says they would not be discouraged from buying full-sugar carbonates regardless of how much the price of a standard 330ml can increased by. Twenty eight percent say an up to 20% price increase – the proposed rate of taxation by some groups – would discourage them from buying.

What consumers really think about sugary soft drinks: the results of our poll

Do you support the idea of a tax on sugary soft drinks?  

By age/gender
  Total Male Female 16-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55+
Yes, it’s a good idea. 45% 47% 43% 43% 38% 42% 46% 49%
No, it’s a bad idea. 35% 38% 32% 38% 39% 34% 33% 34%
I don’t know 21% 16% 25% 20% 24% 24% 21% 17%
By region
  Scot North East North West Yorks Mids Wales South West East London Southeast
Yes, it’s a good idea. 39% 49% 42% 46% 44% 45% 42% 47% 53% 42%
No, it’s a bad idea. 43% 30% 39% 35% 37% 36% 36% 31% 26% 35%
I don’t know 18% 22% 20% 20% 19% 19% 22% 22% 21% 23%
By social group/parental status
  AB C1 C2 DE Parents Non-parents
Yes, it’s a good idea. 51% 42% 46% 41% 45% 44%
No, it’s a bad idea. 34% 36% 36% 34% 33% 36%
I don’t know 15% 22% 18% 24% 23% 19%

Which, if any, of these drinks should be taxed? 

 TotalMaleFemale16-2425-3435-4445-5455+
Which, if any, of these types of drinks do you think should be taxed? 47% 44% 50% 44% 38% 47% 47% 52%
Sugary (excluding diet varieties) carbonated soft drinks (i.e. Coca-Cola; Pepsi; Fanta) 39% 38% 40% 32% 32% 36% 39% 46%
Sugary sports drinks (i.e. Lucozade Sport; Gatorade) 38% 37% 38% 27% 30% 37% 36% 46%
Sugary squashes (excluding no added sugar varieties) (Ribena, Vimto, Robinsons) 27% 28% 26% 16% 18% 26% 26% 36%
Smoothies (Innocent, own label smoothies) 13% 16% 10% 13% 7% 13% 11% 17%
Fruit juices (Tropicana, own label fresh orange juice, Copella, Innocent) 11% 14% 10% 8% 9% 12% 10% 14%
None of these drinks should be taxed 44% 44% 44% 41% 48% 43% 46% 42%

The average price of a sugary carbonated soft drink is 67p.What price would discourage you from buying?  

By age/gender
  Total Male Female 16-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55+
67p is too much 24% 26% 22% 20% 26% 26% 22% 25%
70p (5% increase) 11% 12% 10% 11% 14% 12% 15% 5%
74p (10% increase) 6% 7% 6% 7% 8% 6% 4% 7%
80p (20% increase) 11% 11% 11% 14% 9% 11% 8% 13%
£1 (50%) increase) 28% 28% 28% 34% 23% 26% 30% 28%
No price increase would discourage me from buying it 20% 17% 22% 13% 20% 19% 21% 23%
By region
  Scot North East North West Yorks Mids Wales South West East London Southeast
67p is too much 25% 25% 26% 29% 25% 20% 25% 21% 20% 27%
70p (5% increase) 9% 16% 9% 12% 10% 18% 7% 9% 16% 9%
74p (10% increase) 5% 12% 5% 7% 5% 3% 7% 7% 9% 6%
80p (20% increase) 7% 12% 11% 12% 14% 14% 10% 17% 8% 8%
£1 (50%) increase) 27% 21% 28% 28% 29% 25% 31% 24% 31% 28%
No price increase would discourage me from buying it 27% 13% 20% 14% 17% 20% 21% 23% 17% 22%
By social group/parental status
  AB C1 C2 DE Parents Non-parents
67p is too much 22% 21% 29% 26% 25% 24%
70p (5% increase) 9% 11% 15% 11% 13% 10%
74p (10% increase) 4% 7% 9% 6% 6% 7%
80p (20% increase) 13% 13% 9% 10% 11% 11%
£1 (50%) increase) 32% 30% 22% 27% 29% 27%
No price increase would discourage me from buying it 21% 18% 16% 22% 16% 22%

Should the sale of energy drinks to under-16s be banned?

By age/gender
  Total Male Female 16-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55+
Yes 55% 49% 61% 34% 56% 61% 59% 57%
No 24% 30% 19% 46% 29% 18% 19% 20%
I don’t know 21% 21% 21% 20% 15% 20% 22% 23%
By region
  Scot North East North West Yorks Mids Wales South West East London Southeast
Yes 55% 59% 57% 59% 55% 54% 56% 53% 45% 61%
No 29% 25% 25% 20% 24% 28% 26% 24% 25% 19%
I don’t know 17% 16% 18% 21% 21% 19% 19% 23% 30% 20%
By social group
  AB C1 C2 DE
Yes 58.10% 53.60% 58.80% 52.80%
No 23.80% 25.20% 21.00% 24.80%
I don’t know 18.10% 21.20% 20.20% 22.40%
Parents only
  Total Male Female 16-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55+
Yes 64% 60% 67% 60% 66% 64% 65% 48%
No 21% 26% 16% 24% 25% 16% 22% 21%
I don’t know 16% 14% 17% 17% 9% 20% 13% 31%

Which of the following products would you describe as ’unhealthy’?  

 TotalMaleFemale16-2425-3435-4445-5455+
Regular Cola (e.g. Coke or Pepsi) 75% 70% 81% 70% 69% 78% 80% 77%
Energy drinks (such as Monster; Relentless; Red Bull) 75% 68% 82% 74% 67% 77% 78% 77%
Carbonated fruit drinks (e.g. Fanta, Lilt, Tango) 65% 59% 71% 64% 60% 67% 71% 63%
Cola with artificial sweeteners (e.g. Diet Coke, Coke Zero, Pepsi Max) 56% 50% 62% 65% 57% 53% 56% 55%
Carbonated fruit drinks with artificial sweeteners (Diet or Zero version of Fanta, Lilt, Tango) 51% 46% 56% 61% 46% 49% 54% 50%
Sports drinks (such as Lucozade, Gatorade) 50% 43% 56% 45% 47% 49% 52% 51%
Squash (such as Robinsons, Vimto, Ribena) 21% 18% 24% 22% 18% 19% 22% 23%
Flavoured bottled water 14% 13% 16% 17% 10% 15% 13% 16%
Fruit smoothies 11% 12% 11% 6% 7% 9% 13% 15%
Fruit juice 9% 8% 10% 10% 9% 8% 9% 9%
Fruit & veg smoothies 6% 7% 5% 3% 4% 5% 6% 8%
Fruit & veg juice 5% 5% 4% 8% 6% 4% 6% 3%
None of these 10% 13% 7% 7% 12% 10% 10% 10%

Which of the following statements do you agree with regarding soft drinks? 

By age/gender
  Total Male Female 16-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55+
I avoid added sugar but think naturally occurring sugars are fine 42% 40% 45% 35% 34% 34% 48% 51%
I avoid artificial sweeteners 21% 21% 21% 25% 20% 20% 24% 19%
I avoid all sugar at all costs 13% 13% 12% 6% 10% 15% 12% 16%
I avoid all (artificial or natural) sweeteners 7% 7% 6% 6% 5% 6% 7% 8%
I don’t really think about the sugar content of soft drinks 34% 36% 32% 45% 44% 37% 30% 27%
By region
  Scot North East North West Yorks Mids Wales South West East London Southeast
I avoid added sugar but think naturally occurring sugars are fine 34% 45% 42% 40% 41% 58% 40% 47% 40% 45%
I avoid artificial sweeteners 16% 15% 12% 22% 22% 23% 31% 16% 29% 19%
I avoid all sugar at all costs 13% 10% 14% 13% 9% 10% 15% 17% 14% 13%
I avoid all (artificial or natural) sweeteners 4% 9% 5% 7% 9% 5% 8% 6% 7% 6%
I don’t really think about the sugar content of soft drinks 44% 38% 38% 39% 36% 25% 24% 28% 32% 36%
By social group/parental status
  AB C1 C2 DE Parents Non-parents
I avoid added sugar but think naturally occurring sugars are fine 44% 43% 49% 38% 38% 45%
I avoid artificial sweeteners 22% 19% 25% 20% 20% 21%
I avoid all sugar at all costs 14% 11% 14% 12% 12% 13%
I avoid all (artificial or natural) sweeteners 8% 8% 8% 6% 7% 7%
I don’t really think about the sugar content of soft drinks 29% 35% 25% 41% 38% 32%

Harris Interactive UK polled 2,030 members of the public on behalf of The Grocer during the week commencing 9 March, 2015. Harris Interactive UK is a full service, consultative custom market research agency working internationally out of offices in the UK and Europe. With in-house expertise covering all areas of research design, implementation, analysis and reporting, it has particular strengths in loyalty and brand. For more information, please visit the Harris Interactive UK website