Government healthy eating advice is useless - and Tom Watson's weight loss proves it

  • Print
  • Share
  • Comments (3)
  • Save

Tom Watson_Labour_single use only

Source: Rex Features

Watson’s slim-lining boils down to him ignoring government diet guidelines. Instead, he has embraced the principles of the Pioppi diet

What more graphic challenge could there be to government healthy eating advice than Tom Watson? Only a year ago the deputy Labour leader was seriously obese. He looked like a larger-than-life cartoon character next to lean Jeremy Corbyn. Now Watson is a new man. He has shed seven stones, and his type 2 diabetes is in remission; he no longer needs medication.

Watson’s slim-lining boils down to him ignoring government diet guidelines. They tell us to fill our plates with starchy foods, and avoid saturated fat.

Read more: Is Jamie’s Tesco role more than just an ad coup?

Instead, Watson has embraced the principles of the Pioppi diet, which is not a fixed-term diet as such, more a way to eat for life.

Pioppi, brainchild of campaigning cardiologist Dr Aseem Malhotra, is simple. Abandon calorie counting. Fat isn’t the foe. Just cut out sugar, starchy carbs, and processed food. Of course, Pioppi doesn’t have a patent on these ideas; it simply encapsulates international, new-wave thinking about what constitutes a healthy diet. It’s an approach, which, as Watson has found, could be highly effective in ridding Britain of the scourge of obesity and related diseases.

We have so obviously come to the end of the road with the status quo ‘Eatwell plate’. It was designed by self-interested food processors, and the government’s so-called expert scientific advisors went along with it. This guidance patently doesn’t work. Thirty per cent of Britons are obese; a third of our children leave primary school overweight.

Yet year after year, all we hear from the agencies charged with dispensing nutrition advice is that despite their best efforts, this deadly state of affairs is getting worse. Cue another patronising, kindergarten pep talk on why we lazy citizens must try harder to eat as we are told.

More from Joanna Blythman: High streets of the future don’t have space for Big Retail

But as Watson says, we must stop blaming individuals; the answer is not in their hands alone. Labour has pledged to halt the rise of diabetes and has called on experts, charities, patients and, tellingly, independent thinkers to inform its strategy. And I believe this bold new plan could work, as embodied by the new-look Tom Watson. Why? Labour appears to be prepared to shred the failed healthy eating orthodoxies that got us into this mess in the first place. That’s a brilliant, and very necessary, starting point.

Joanna Blythman is a journalist and author of Swallow This

Readers' comments (3)

  • I applaud The Grocer in publishing an article that so openly damns the UK's 'self-interested food-processors' and their role in the societal apocalypse of diet related chronic illness.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Guy Cuthbert

    Tom Watson's successful reversal of type-2 diabetes should certainly be celebrated, but to extrapolate the success of one individual to a nationwide obesity solution is unwise at best and irresponsible at worst.

    My own personal experiences suggest that a low-sugar (or low-GI) diet deliver better (weight, blood pressure etc.) results than low-fat, but I wouldn't use personal experience to call for a policy change.

    By all means, call for the re-evaluation of scientific studies (a la Ben Goldacre and AllTrials), but jumping to conclusions that suit the author is following in the alleged bad practice of the "self-interested food processors, and the government’s so-called expert scientific advisors".

    Let scientific method prevail.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • What a shame this journalist feels that a reduction in heart disease due to the government's robust advice isn't worth celebrating. More so, what a shame she doesn't appear to understand the basics of nutrition otherwise she probably wouldn't make such ridiculous statements. But then again what would one expect from someone an unqualified in nutrition. The opinion expressed here has been proven time and time again to be worthless, yet some still feel they can make such statements without understanding the potential damage they could cause.

    If we revert to high fat, low carbohydrate standard advice, just exactly what do you think will happen? Now think carefully about this, as the totality of evidence would weigh against any argument you could put up. And where would we be in 10 years time? I would put my money on higher obesity rates, higher heart disease, higher cancer, and higher diabetes. Would you care to take the bet and prove that you wouldn't be at greater risk of these health ailments if you followed such unproven advice?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

Sign up to a Free 30 day Gold Membership Trial

  • Claim your free trial >>
  • You will be able to:

    - Comment on your industry
    - Read the latest category information
    - Find out more on consumer behaviours to technological advances

    You must sign in to make a comment

    • Print
    • Share
    • Comments (3)
    • Save

    DIRECTORY

    The+Grocer+Directory

    CLICK HERE to search for the products, services and companies you need in the definitive guide to the UK food and drink industry.

    Grocer jobs Experts in FMCG

    Essity Grocery Controller (Senior Sales Manager)

    Grocery Controller (Senior Sales Manager) - Essity

    excellent salary +car, bonus, PMI, pension
    Search jobs

    FOLLOW THE GROCER

    -

     
    Yes!I want to read more     CLAIM FREE TRIAL NOW
     
    Sign up to a 30 day free trial
    CLAIM FREE TRIAL NOW