EPR packaging fees are a slap in the face to manufacturing

By Talia Goldman, ESG director at Colpac and co-chair & co-founder of the Alliance for Fibre-Based Packaging 2025-07-15T11:56:00

EPR is meant to drive better recyclability and environmental outcomes, Instead, it looks likely to promote more plastic and cheaper imports, says Talia Goldman, ESG director at Colpac and co-chair & co-founder of the Alliance for Fibre-Based Packaging

The newly published extended producer responsibility (EPR) fees for packaging have left many in the industry baffled.

EPR packaging fees are a slap in the face to manufacturing

Want access to this article?

Register for LIMITED access

Get PREMIUM access for £1 a week