Why KFC will benefit from ad backlash

  • Print
  • Share
  • Comments (1)
  • Save

KFC Whole Chicken ad_screenshot

KFC’s new ad promotes the idea that it uses the whole chicken in its products

KFC’s new ‘The Whole Chicken’ ad, which features a confident chicken strutting its stuff, has raised hundreds of complaints. Many people – mainly vegetarians and vegans – labelled it ‘offensive’, ‘misleading’ and ‘distressing’.

Perhaps the brand’s marketing managers are already cursing their new agency for a disastrous first campaign. They shouldn’t. This short-term negativity will likely lead to long-term gain.

What matters most is that the brand is cutting through to the people who will buy the product. Look at Unruly’s Super Bowl white paper which showed that after Mountain Dew’s Puppymonkeybaby was aired, 20% of the total audience felt worse about the brand. But close to 50% of their actual target (millennial men) loved it. I doubt they’re crying over that 20%.

If your target audience are engaged but some of the non-targeted are offended, it’s still job done. But you must truly understand your audience to make sure you’re saying the right things to the right people. Among the scandalised in this context, the significant majority are vegetarians and vegans—hardly KFC’s target market.

Audiences are more polarised than ever and much quicker to proclaim moral outrage. Their angst is now actionable and immediate thanks to the web. But to avoid offence in this new world is to condemn marketing to safe, easily forgettable and often bland campaigns. The brain is built to ignore the old and focus on the new—courting controversy in a smart way is proven to deliver results.

The key is to build content that makes waves and divides opinion.

Remember the legendary Tango ‘Orange Man’ advert which visualised the strapline ‘You Know When You’ve Been Tango’d’ with a happy slap? It spurred a violent fad in playgrounds up and down the country, which eventually saw the ads being pulled after one too many burst eardrums. But by that point they had already achieved what they set out to do: selling drinks while establishing the mischievous tone of the brand in stark contrast to safer, Coke-owned alternatives.

In KFC’s case, brand ‘outrage’ has led to widespread media coverage, making headlines in the likes of the Daily Mail and the Independent, amplifying the campaign far beyond the media it paid for.

Brands need to learn that outrage is stickier than sentimentality—and it often pays a much higher reward.

Joe Wade is co-founder of Don’t Panic

Related videos

Readers' comments (1)

  • I think Joe has missed a big point. Yes the vegans vegetarians and animal rights people are expressing outrage, but that's not why this campaign is poorly thought out. The target market do not want to associate the live chicken with what they get in their "bucket". They are happy with the distance, the construct, their own internal "lie" that what is on their plate was never a living feeling animal. The agency have even given the chicken some funky dance moves!! It will be a bit like Arthur's reaction to the cow at the restaurant at the end of the universe.

    I think the problem they will have IS with the target market. There's a reason you don't see pictures of live chickens on KFCs menu boards :-).

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

Sign up to a Free 30 day Gold Membership Trial

  • Claim your free trial >>
  • You will be able to:

    - Comment on your industry
    - Read the latest category information
    - Find out more on consumer behaviours to technological advances

    You must sign in to make a comment

    • Print
    • Share
    • Comments (1)
    • Save



    CLICK HERE to search for the products, services and companies you need in the definitive guide to the UK food and drink industry.



    Yes!I want to read more     CLAIM FREE TRIAL NOW
    Sign up to a 30 day free trial