Why should responsible drinkers pay more campaign aims to 'kill' alcohol minimum pricing proposals

  • Print
  • Share
  • Comments (3)
  • Save

Supermarkets and drinks suppliers are joining forces to try to kill the government’s minimum pricing plans, The Grocer can reveal.

A new campaign spearheaded by the Wine & Spirit Trade Association is being backed by companies including Asda, Sainsbury’s, Morrisons, Diageo and SABMiller, who hope to galvanise public support against the proposals, which they claim will unfairly penalise responsible drinkers.

Under the banner Why Should Responsible Drinkers Pay More?, it is expected to produce heavy-hitting research, and will include a public petition against minimum pricing, while also calling on customers to tweet their local MP expressing their opposition. The WSTA has also secured significant backing for a marketing campaign involving radio and PR. .

The website, www.whyshouldwepaymore.co.uk, goes live on Tuesday and will feature a calculator showing the public how the proposals for a 45p per unit minimum would impact on their favourite drinks.

Minimum pricing would see 52% of prices in the off-trade rise overnight, with 71% of vodka, 62% of whisky and 38% of wine increasing in cost.

Retailers and suppliers are drawing up a catalogue of evidence against the plans, in response to the Home Office consultation, which closes on the 6 February. It will also try to torpedo the proposed ban on multibuy promotions.

As well as three major supermarkets as founding partners, WSTA chief executive Miles Beale said “the fact we also have the support of one of the world’s biggest brewers in SABMiller is also hugely significant as it fears this policy could set a precedent that could have an impact across the world.”

The campaign will focus on how out of touch the plans are with the economic situation, the lack of research behind them and the impact on poorest families.

“If it were not for this issue being something that David Cameron has nailed his colours to the mast on, it could very well have been dropped already, such is the opposition within parliament,” said Beale. “We will be targeting MPs but the main aim is to get ordinary people on board and if we do that we feel there is a very strong chance of killing this.”

He also revealed he had to talk a string of major companies out of walking away from the government’s Responsibility Deal, which has included a pledge to slash a billion units of alcohol from the UK alcohol market by 2015, because of the government’s “schizophrenic” attitude to the drinks industry.

Readers' comments (3)

  • You do your research and make sure you can back everything up with cold, hard facts/documentation because government will come at you with as much junk science as they think they need. beware, it is government that speaks with forked tongue!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Choice:
    A: Pay a tiny amount more up front if you drink responsibly, in order to try to slow down irresponsible drinkers buying large quantities of supermarket offers by restricting what their budget can afford;
    or
    B: http://news.bbcimg.co.uk/media/images/53011000/gif/_53011087_alcohol_304.gif
    Spend it later through your tax funded NHS, in addition to the huge overpriced carpark fees while visiting friends and family in agony in hospital.

    No guarantees that A will work - but surely worth a try?

    What we're doing now is clearly NOT working, and you never change a strategy by doing more of what has failed.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • '..torpedo the proposed ban on multibuy promotions.'

    These are already banned, it came into effect last year.

    Fine with me, but I will do everything I can to oppose this ridiculous MUP. It will not have any effect other than to create more problems for alcoholics and responsible drinkers on low incomes.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

These comments have not been moderated.

You are encouraged to participate with comments that are relevant to our news stories. You should not post comments that are abusive, threatening, defamatory, misleading or invasive of privacy. For the full terms and conditions for commenting see clause 7 of our Terms and Conditions ‘Participating in Online Communities’. These terms may be updated from time to time, so please read them before posting a comment.

Any comment that violates these terms may be removed in its entirety as we do not edit comments.

If you wish to complain about a comment please use the “report this comment” facility or email groceremails@wrbm.com

Mandatory
Mandatory
Mandatory
Mandatory

Related images

  • Big hitters join forces to 'kill' minimum pricing proposals
  • Why should responsible drinkers pay more
  • Print
  • Share
  • Comments (3)
  • Save
Sign in

Newsletter Sign-up

Free

I wish to receive the following newsletters:

For Members

Become a Gold Member to receive these newsletters:

Become a Finance Member to receive these newsletters:

Become a member of The Grocer

DIRECTORY

The+Grocer+Directory

CLICK HERE to search for the products, services and companies you need in the definitive guide to the UK food and drink industry.

FOLLOW THE GROCER

The Grocer's commentators and opinion makers