The incredible shrinking Christmas confectionery
The festive rattle of the Christmas chocolate tin will be quieter this year after Cadbury shrunk the weight of chocolates in each one by up to 16%.
A tin of Cadbury's Roses now weighs 850g, down from 975g, while a tin of Heroes now contains 800g of chocolate 150g less than last Christmas. The reduction is the equivalent of 11 fewer chocolates in each tin.
However, shelf and wholesale prices have remained flat effectively passing on a double-digit price hike to customers.
Cadbury had decided to shrink the tins because of rising commodity costs, a spokesman said. "However, we still believe that our tins represent excellent value for money," he added.
Nestlé's Quality Street tin will remain at 1kg after it shed 100g last year, while Mars' Celebrations tubs remain at 855g, after shrinking from 975g two years ago.
Tesco, the first supermarket to stock the tins this year, is advertising them at half price for £5, the most popular promotional mechanic last year.
One wholesale trading controller said shrinking the pack was a better choice than price rises. "It's more important to maintain a successful price point based on the current climate of rising raw material costs," he said.
Consumers would notice the difference, but few would be deterred from buying, he added. "Virtually everybody has changed pack sizes. Consumers understand the cost of food now."
But Lucy Yates, principal policy advocate at Consumer Focus, warned companies to be honest with their customers about the price hikes.
"Consumers aren't always easy to fool they can see that paying the same for fewer chocolates is effectively the same as a price increase. Companies need to remember that shrinking size but not price could damage consumers' trust in the brands they love."
Cadbury has meanwhile abandoned a trial to move packaging over to recyclable cardboard boxes.
In 2009, it began selling Roses and Heroes in so-called 'cartins' at 500 Tesco stores. At the time Cadbury said the move would cut packaging weight by 45% and save more than 200 tonnes of steel.
Last year the trial switched to selling all 950g boxes of Heroes in cardboard as a Tesco exclusive, doubling the amount of cartins it used.
However, the company confirmed it had returned to tin for 2011 after consumers snubbed the eco-friendly alternative.
"We spoke extensively with consumers to understand their reaction to cartins last year but the feedback was disappointing," a spokesman said.










Readers' comments (2)
Nitesh Shah | 08 Sep 2011 15:48
although consumers are still paying more for the chocolates, as purses and wallets go, they are more concerned with spending less than getting a little less.
food costs are on the increase, and with increasing competition between retailers, they need to promote more to get consumers to spend their hard-earned cash at their store and not with a competitor. This is resulting in substantial cost increases for manufacturers on top of raw material and packaging cost increases.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 20 Sep 2011 11:30
The suggestion that the so called cartin is an eco-friendly alternative to a tin is misleading.
The introductory trial of the cartin was, as its name reflects, just that: and at the time, the only reference made to its eco-friendly credentials was to the pack being lighter. As this article rightly points out, the pack was snubbed by consumers who preferred the traditional version, a real tin, and the trial concluded.
Using metal, a material which should never go to landfill and is truly recycled in an infinite loop whilst retaining its original resources, may well be regarded as opting for the real eco-friendly option.
Jumping to conclusions in this very complex area only exacerbates misunderstandings over what constitutes ‘eco-friendly’.
Nick Mullen , Director, Metal Packaging Manufacturers Association
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment