Why we should resist the vegan putsch

  • Print
  • Share
  • Comments (3)
  • Save

vegan vegetarian food salad

Eat-Lancet has decided we should no longer eat the nutritious animal foods that have sustained us for millennia

Vegans, about 1% of the population when I last checked, are currently trying to shape the public discourse on food. According to them, all animal foods, irrespective of their production method or level of processing, are catastrophic for both human health and the environment and so must be cut to a minimum, preferably eliminated. This extreme statement is now routinely advanced, and taken at face value by some, as incontrovertible scientific fact.

Look at Veganuary, once little more than a social media hashtag for the vegan party faithful. It has stepped up its propaganda war with emotive public transport ads. ‘Love animals? Stop eating us’, is one such simplistic slogan.

More from Joanna Blythman: Veganism was behind the ‘meat tax’ hype – so what happened to critical thinking?

Animal rights extremists are stepping up ‘direct actions’ (pickets, occupations) that target the most ethical businesses, such as social enterprise Hisbe, in Brighton, because it dares to sell well sourced, ethically produced meat, fish, eggs, and dairy.

Doubtless such groups will relish the launch this week of a campaign by the Eat-Lancet Commission. This well-financed transnational organisation of strategically placed, influential individuals has decided humans should no longer routinely eat the nutritious animal foods that have sustained them for millennia. Eat-Lancet advocates a global shift to a ‘plant-based’ diet, drawing its intellectual inspiration in part from the World Resources Institute, a think tank that argues for a mass, planet-wide transition to plant-based eating through controversial mechanisms such as “influencing nutritional labelling and dietary guidelines”, taxing meat, and “removing meat from restaurant menus”.

Plant-based decoded: The Grocer to host free webinar

The sheer vaulting ambition is breathtaking. In effect, it’s a top-down attempt by a small, unrepresentative, dogmatic global elite to mould public agriculture policy.

It could lead to cranky diets and nutritional deficiencies in affluent countries and acute protein shortages in the poorer ones. Soil fertility would be lost and carbon sinks dug up as sustainably reared, pastured livestock are shunned and plant food monoculture, predicated on fossil fuel-derived pesticides, is applauded.

I hope this anti-animal food putsch is seen for what it is, and meets with active resistance.

Joanna Blythman is a journalist and author of Swallow This

Readers' comments (3)

  • A disappointing read given the many challenges we face collectively as a nation with obesity and globally with climate change.This article comes across a wildly overcooked reaction to what ultimately will be seen as a pivot point for our relationship with food as a species in years to come.

    It is hard to find any scientific evidence that would disagree with the theory that eating less meat is better for the planet and the individual. The Eat Lancets suggestion should be welcomed for their informed contribution to the public debate around healthy eating habits, they should not demonized as some sort of partisan militant group.

    This article could be better served by dialing down the use of populist language and recognising where food trends are going internationally, which is away from the resource intensive rearing of animal protein, towards a more sustainable system of plant based alternatives.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Is everyone aware that Monsanto are on the committee behind the EAT-Lancet report. And we are expected to take dietary advice from them? Let's have a look at the credentials of the people behind this report and I guarantee there are huge food companies (who don't sell meat) deciding what the other 99% of the world should eat because it makes profits for them. No agricultural expertise behind the report. It has already been slammed by the Sustainable Food Trust yet every tuppeny-ha'penny expert is rushing forward to give their opinion. We are being led by donkeys. Again.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Robin Norton

    Erm, I'm not sure the whole EAT-Lancet Commission are vegan, or in thrall to the vegan movement.Doing what we are doing now, or doing what we used to do are no longer viable options for consumers or food producers around the world.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

  • Print
  • Share
  • Comments (3)
  • Save

Grocer jobs Experts in FMCG

SmithCarey Recruitment Sales Director

Sales Director - SmithCarey Recruitment

Six figure basic + bonus, car & benefits
Search jobs

DIRECTORY

The+Grocer+Directory

CLICK HERE to search for the products, services and companies you need in the definitive guide to the UK food and drink industry.

FOLLOW THE GROCER

-

 
Yes!I want to read more     CLAIM FREE TRIAL NOW
 
Sign up to a 30 day free trial
CLAIM FREE TRIAL NOW