Close menu
- Home
- Retail & Wholesale
-
Products & Suppliers
- Back to parent navigation item
- Products & Suppliers
-
Product Categories:
- Back to parent navigation item
- Product Categories:
- Alcoholic drinks
- Bakery
- Cereals & breakfast
- Cheese
- Chicken & poultry
- Chocolate
- Confectionery
- Crisps, nuts & snacks
- Dairy
- Fish
- Fresh produce
- Frozen
- Household
- Meat
- Own Label
- Sauces & condiments
- Seasonal
- Soft drinks
- Vaping
- Vegan & plant-based
- World foods
- Suppliers
- People
- Reports & Data
-
Topics A-Z
- Back to parent navigation item
- Topics A-Z
-
Popular topics:
- Back to parent navigation item
- Popular topics:
- Cost of living crisis
- Crime
- Deposit Return Schemes
- Finance
- Government & Regulation
- Health
- Inflation
- Loyalty
- Marketing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- New Product Development
- Sourcing
- Supply chain
- Sustainability & environment
- Technology
- Ultra Processed Foods
- Vaping
- A-Z all topics
- Content by type:
- Events
- Ask iA (beta)
- Subscribe now
Nutrient profiling model evidence ‘not fit for purpose’
By Ian Quinn2026-04-29T10:54:00
’Critics claim the impact assessment is hugely flawed both from an economic and health benefits perspective
The government’s impact assessment justifying a switch to the 2018 nutrient profiling model is “not fit for purpose” and makes huge assumptions about how it will affect consumer behaviour, claim the food and advertising industries.
Already have an account? Sign in here
Already have an account? Sign in here